Panama Verdict: Few Questions That Are Still Unanswered


Panama Verdict: Few Questions That Are Still Unanswered


Disclaimer*: The articles shared under 'Your Voice' section are sent to us by contributors and we neither confirm nor deny the authenticity of any facts stated below. Parhlo News will not be liable for any false, inaccurate, inappropriate or incomplete information presented on the website. Read our disclaimer.

This post is also available in: العربية (Arabic) اردو (Urdu)

The story has finally ended. Prime Minister has been disqualified based on exposure of a paid position where the respondent has declared of not receiving financial benefits from that position. However, per dictionary, the asset definition includes such activity and it should have been declared in the nomination paper for the seat of Parliament. How strange it is that the main term in nomination paper has no meaning in Representation of the People Act. A nominee needs to consult (many nominees does not know the common meaning of an asset) the Black law dictionary and then include all that comes under asset.

Snap Chat Tap to follow